Tag Archives: Forensic Accountant

Now That I Think About It…

408H

When we talk about fraud and how it tends to happen, the classic fraud triangle is most commonly used to help us understand how it all happens. The sides of this triangle represent opportunity, pressure and rationalization. In this triangle there is a person, just a regular old person, like you and me. Fraud can happen to anyone and fraudsters are often regular people who find themselves under pressure, faced with the opportunity to perpetrate a fraud and the ability to rationalize it all.

Sometimes this person may face pressures. Maybe she has a family member who gets sick and now they have to deal with massive bills. Maybe the person has a gambling problem. Maybe he wants to live the jet set life that he sees his friends living. Whatever the reason may be, these people feel under a lot of pressure to get their hands on more money than they are currently earning.

Pressure or not, maybe this person sees an opportunity to defraud. Perhaps he can sign checks, AND, he has custody of the checkbook AND he performs the company’s bank reconciliations. He has all this access and responsibility and no one checking his work. So, now he has access to the money and he can doctor the books to cover up his wrongdoing. However it works out, these people see a weakness that they can take advantage of.

The third leg of this triangle is rationalization. This is where a person tells himself that there is a justification for what he is doing. Maybe she tells herself that she really needs the money to deal with this one emergency and this will happen only once. Maybe she then tells herself that this will happen only once and, to boot, she has been a loyal employee for a while so the company really owes her a little leeway for all that she has done. Maybe she tells herself that once she is out of this spot of trouble, she will pay the company back and it will be like it never happened in the first place. Maybe he tells himself that he is underpaid and that what he is doing is merely taking the money that he is rightly owed for all the hard work and time that he puts into the business. The rationalizations that people use are practically endless.

Earlier this year, I listened to the podcast “Ponzi Supernova”, a podcast about Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme and what has happened since. One thing that was fascinating about this series was the conversations that Steve Fishman, journalist and narrator of the series, had with Bernie Madoff, infamous perpetrator of a massive Ponzi scheme. Bernie talked about his childhood and how affected he was by his father’s financial failures. Bernie tells Steve that, after seeing his father lose a lot of money and what it did to the family, Bernie swore he would never let that happen to him (perhaps one could see this as a pressure looming over his life). In the early 1960’s, Bernie Madoff violated market regulations and his clients’ trust by losing their money on risky deals. Instead of letting them know that this had happened, he lied to his clients, borrowed money from his father-in-law and carried on as though he was a brilliant investor. Speaking with Fishman, Madoff made it sound as though, because he did not want to fail as his father had, he took these steps so that he could continue to, at least, appear to be successful and very talented.

Bernie Madoff spoke with Steve Fishman a couple of years after he was caught (though, in some versions of his story, he claims he quit). Bernie Madoff also spoke with Diana Henriques, who wrote the book The Wizard of Lies, which is now an HBO Film by the same title. Their interactions also occurred a couple of years after Madoff’s fraud was discovered. After he had plead guilty to his crime. Yet, over and over again, Madoff seemed to continue to make excuses for his behavior and try to minimize what he did. Even though, when pleading guilty, he claimed that he acted alone, he has since changed his tune and as co-conspirators have testified against him, he then seems to say, “well, except for that person, I acted alone”. So, it seems that even after being caught, he is only sharing as much of the truth as he needs to and, what I have found to be most interesting, is that he appears to continue to rationalize what he did.

In an ideal world, one would imagine that having a fraud exposed and pleading guilty would bring a fraudster to his senses. When we imagine a person committing fraud as a regular person who has fallen into irregular behavior, the hope is that putting an end to this irregular behavior will bring this person to her senses and get them to admit that what they did was without excuses; that, even though they rationalized their actions when they perpetuated the fraud, they now saw the error of their ways and realized that the rationalizations were all without merit. During the hearing when he plead guilty, Madoff read a prepared statement where he apologized to his victims. However, even that apology came with a “but” attached. “While I never promised a specific rate of return to any client, I felt compelled to satisfy my clients’ expectations, at any cost.” Yet, listening to Ponzi Supernova, you learn that some clients would demand an adjustment to their statements when they did not receive the return they had been promised. Madoff has also placed blame on his victims, claiming that they knew, or should have known, what they were getting into, that he had warned them and that they did not lose as much as they claimed. And, I have found that it is not just Madoff who does this. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners talks to people who were convicted of fraud and, in video after video, the perpetrators found ways to hold others responsible for what they did – and this is after they had been found guilty and served their sentences. For instance, one blamed her supervisor for being too trusting, “I don’t blame them but…” she started her sentence. Another stated, “I asked you for help and you said no”, while yet another said “I won’t get caught again”, not “I won’t do it again because I realize it was wrong.

It may be human to not want to admit full responsibility. Perhaps it is too hard for most of us to admit that we have done terrible things. Who really wants to be a monster, blamed for ruining lives, even when those lives are laid out in front for you? And if we are not harshly judging ourselves, even when caught, then can we really adjust our behaviors to do right and get back on the straight and narrow? I don’t know the answers to this but it is something I think about as I perform my work as a forensic accountant. If a person is not able to strip away rationalization and admit that they were just wrong when they perpetuated their fraud, then what are the chances that it won’t be so difficult to do it again?

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Who Is The Accountant?

calculator-385506_1920

I have been excited about watching “The Accountant” for over a year, when I first heard about this movie – a film about a forensic accountant! I lived in fear of the project being canceled by film bigwigs, who would decide that no one wanted to see a movie about an accountant. Accountants are almost never depicted, on screen, as anyone worth one’s time. You can’t love or hate them, they are too boring to think about. But here was a movie and the filmmaker was so confident about it that he called it “The Accountant.”  I would tell people how excited I was about the film and they would almost always express surprise that anyone would want to make a film about a CPA, let alone watch one. I don’t blame them because just about every time I have seen a CPA being portrayed on film or television, I don’t want to be him (and it is almost always a him). He is a guy with zero social skills that people put up with because he is some kind of numbers-whisperer; a guy who can find secrets in the numbers that the true heroes are too busy being interesting to find. So, on Sunday, I dragged my husband, who is a true saint, to the movie theaters to watch “The Accountant.”

From the previews, you will see that Ben Affleck, the Accountant, seriously lacks social skills and does not appear to have any friends. He is, as a forensic accountant, a super numbers-whisperer who gobbles up financial statements for breakfast, lunch and dinner.  However, he is also the hero and is an incredibly interesting guy who can do all the running, jumping and full mystery solving that heroes can! They also threw in the story of Crazy Eddie and his “Panama pump”. I may have been the only person in the movie theater who exclaimed in excitement when that came up, but the story of Crazy Eddie is one of many years of various fraud schemes, ranging from money laundering and tax evasion, to financial statement fraud.  I had a great time watching this movie and, I even forgave the woman who yelled out a spoiler reveal before it happened.

It seems that many had been convinced to try out a film about a forensic accountant. “The Accountant” won the box office this weekend, by a massive margin that you don’t have to be an accountant to understand. This gives me hope for the future of CPAs on the screen (big or small). I can see it now – characters who are at least as interesting as lawyers and doctors. We may even be portrayed as people who can tell funny jokes, who can be engaging and who can even have friends: I am excited about films that break long-standing stereotypes. Maybe I am getting ahead of myself, but I will say something that is a first, with respect to how I feel about a CPA of any kind on TV or on film. I watched this movie and I came out wanting to be a forensic accountant!

 

Tagged , , , ,

Cheating Mysteries

Cheating-feature-photo2

When I first started running long distance, my goal was to run the New York Marathon. After I completed the Chicago Marathon, things changed a little. Of course I still held my breath every year, hoping to make it into the New York Marathon. But I also had another distant dream – qualifying for the Boston Marathon. It was a distant dream because I would need to run a qualifying time in order to get into Boston and my pace at that time was nowhere near one that would get me into Boston. Over the last few years, my pace has improved and qualifying for Boston has become a more attainable dream. Over the years, I have also come to know more runners and have found that many of us aspire to qualify. I know I am always in awe of a person who has qualified for Boston – it is no mean feat.

With the line of work that I am in, I should not have been surprised, but I was, when I read a recent Runner’s World piece about people who cheat to get into the Boston Marathon. I wanted to run the New York Marathon because I was inspired by the runners who ran past my block, the runners who would touch all five boroughs that make up the city that I call home. I enjoy running races in cities and towns that I have never been to, as I find it a great way to visit and discover new places. When I think about Boston, I don’t necessarily think about running the race itself. The power of Boston, for me and for many that I speak with is in what it takes to qualify. That is the challenge. So, when I read about people who cheated by getting someone else to run a qualifying time in their place, or by cutting a course, I was baffled. Where is the joy in telling someone that you achieved something that you didn’t or that you had someone achieve on your behalf? When I speak with fellow runners, I tend to speak with like-minded people who are just as baffled as I am.

This article reminded me that just because one cannot understand the motivations of a cheater, it does not mean that the cheating will not happen. The fact that many of us cannot understand this motivation is exactly what those that cheat bank on. If no one can imagine how or why someone would fake qualifying for the Boston Marathon, the chances are high that a person will get away with faking in order to qualify for the Boston Marathon. This is something that we all should be mindful of, beyond the realms of the Boston Marathon. Way too often, a business owner or manager will forgo instituting checks and balances in their company, because that business owner can’t imagine that anyone that works for them could be the kind of person that would defraud them.

It is important to take steps to keep from being blindsided by your world view. Precisely because you can’t imagine how a person could behave in a fraudulent manner is why you should seek out the services of a forensic accountant, whose job it is to both imagine how a person could defraud you and how to prevent and detect such actions. We all hope that people will be honest, but it is a sad truth that for various reasons, people will cheat. In the context of the Boston Marathon, perhaps some people feel that they are so close to a qualifying time that a little cheat is not such a bad thing. Maybe some people hunger for praise, even if they have not earned it. Maybe some people just don’t think it is a big deal to cheat in order to get into Boston and see it as a victimless crime. In the context of a business, some people may face personal pressures that they feel push them to fraud. Some people may feel that they are not sufficiently appreciated by their employer and may, therefore, feel justified in taking from that employer. No one is immune from the pressures or motivations that lead to fraud, but what we can do is take steps to make it as difficult as possible to be defrauded.

 

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

When To Fold ‘Em

Sports-betting

We are a household of sports fans and this tends to be just about the only live television that we watch. Because we can’t fast forward through the commercials during live games, I have watched commercials about daily fantasy sports. A lot of commercials about daily fantasy sports (DFS). It doesn’t matter whether it is DraftKings or FanDuel, as they both seem just about the same. I have heard about how you can win millions, practically for free, and about how easy it all is. I know nothing about fantasy sports, and I have come away mostly irritated by how ubiquitous the advertising is than wanting to try out the daily fantasy sports scene. I also don’t trust them when they tell me that I could win money for nothing and, instead, I wonder how they could claim to give away so much money for nothing and still pay for the many, many ads that are everywhere we look.

Answers came to me at the beginning of October, when a DFS scandal hit the news. As the story went, a DraftKings employee released key information earlier than he should. This information, if known, would give someone a tactical edge when playing fantasy football. The same employee also won $350,000 betting at FanDuel. Even though this doesn’t look good, DraftKings says they are certain that, even with an extra $350,000 in his pocket, their employee did not act improperly – he merely made a mistake. As I read the story, I shook my head in disbelief. I was surprised by several things. First of all, I was surprised to discover that Daily Fantasy Sports betting is not considered to be gambling. Now, I know hardly anything about daily fantasy sports, so it may indeed be a game of skill and not luck. However, especially with terms like “betting” used when talking about it, it sure does look a lot like gambling. That said, interviews that I have seen and read show those who spend a lot of money on DFS referring to it as investing. Nevada recently shut down DraftKings and FanDuel, declaring that DFS is gambling and that the two companies need licences before they can operate in that state. So, in that regard, let’s go with more and more people are agreeing with me on the whole “is it gambling” question.

More surprising, though, was the employee betting. To have a company that runs the betting allow its employees to bet as well smacks of impropriety, regardless of whatever steps the companies claimed they took to keep things on the up and up. Both FanDuel and DraftKings would not let their employees bet with them but those same employees, armed with whatever insider information they might (or might not) have, were able to go to competitor sites and bet there. And bet they did and how surprised are we to find out that the top winners in daily fantasy sports tended to be employees of DraftKings and FanDuel (though never from their own employer, of course).

As I read articles and watched news pieces on what was going on in the Daily Fantasy Sports realm, I kept exclaiming, to anyone within earshot, “who thought this was okay? How could they think it was okay?”

I couldn’t believe that management at this company could look at the set up was acceptable. Maybe they did, or maybe they just thought they could get away with it but it has me wondering about what operation and control policies other entities have in place that either do not protect them and their assets, or even put them at greater risk. Just because you institute a rule, it does not mean that it is a good or useful rule. For instance, DraftKings employees, with all the inside information they potentially had access to, could not place a bet with their employer, DraftKings. However, they could log into FanDuel, their competitor and use their edge when placing bets there. And the policy was mirrored by FanDuel. Looking in from the outside, both companies appeared to be acting unethically, and just about always, perceptions are as powerful as reality. If it looks as though someone is having a $350,000 party with your money, the facts will matter very little to you.

It might feel very managerial to make rules in your organization, but if all they serve to do is fill operations manuals and make you feel good, they are achieving less than nothing. It is worse than not making rules at all because, at least when you don’t have regulations, you have no illusions about whether or not you are protected. On the other hand, creating a free for all entity may make you feel like the cool kid and may even have people clamoring to work for you. However, among those clamoring, it is almost guaranteed, will be those seeing ample opportunity to commit fraud and perhaps lay waste to your business. There are very important reasons why people like me preach setting up your business in ways that prevent and detect fraud and two of these reasons are protecting your assets and protecting your reputation.

Now, FanDuel and DraftKings are finding themselves on the defensive and being given the cold shoulder by entities who do not want to be tainted by the growing scandals. They are being investigated by state and federal authorities, and are now scrambling to clean up an image that would never have been sullied if they had formed their operating and control structures correctly and ethically, in practice and appearance, from the get go. Now they are tripping over themselves, doing things like creating self-regulatory bodies in order to regain the trust of the public. Judging from what I have read, that is not working very well – something that happens when a company has betrayed the public’s trust. Instead these companies are being put under the microscope and their reputation is taking a beating. They are on the defensive now and all of this could have very easily been avoided. If you are running a business, you should ensure that you consult with a qualified professional to avoid issues such as:

  • Conflict of interest in perception and reality;
  • Approaches that compromise your reputation; and
  • Procedures that may cross legal lines.

Spending time and resources doing things property in the first place is less costly, in dollars and reputation, than trying to clean things up after the damage is done. That kind of disaster can be very difficult to come back from. Is it something you are ready to bet on?

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Checking Up

smile

Several years ago, I was working on an assignment that had me flying out to Boca Raton, Florida, every Monday and returning to New York City on Friday night. It was great because it was a brutal winter in New York City and pleasantly warm in Boca Raton. It was terrible because it was close to impossible to get anything done over the weekend. One week, I had to admit that there I needed to get one of my teeth looked at. It had been causing me some pain and I knew I had to sort it out before it started hurting a lot. My challenge was to find a dentist who took patients on weekend days and who I could get to easily. I found one online and went in to see him on a Saturday morning. He determined that I needed a filling fixed and he got to work. What I remember about that day is how incredibly painful it was and how unsympathetically the dentist kept ordering me to “be strong”. I was traumatized – so much so that I did not go anywhere near a dentist’s office for years after that. I knew I should, but the memory of the pain and a dentist who was in need of a heart kept me away. Other aspects of my body were very well taken of; I went to my annual physical and that was always a pleasure, compared to my dental disaster. I brushed my teeth but, other than that, they were pretty much on their own.

One nights, I fell asleep while sucking on a throat sweet and, the next morning, I woke up feeling as though my teeth were about to fall out of my head. I was in a panic; I was too young to be toothless. I was desperate and looked up dentists located close to my office. Thankfully, I was able to find a dentist, a few blocks away, who was able to fit me in that very day. As he examined me, a poem from my childhood, “Oh, I Wish I’d Looked After Me Teeth” ran through my head. Fortunately, this time around, I get to keep my teeth. My dentist was a great guy who doesn’t believe in causing pain and suffering and NEVER says to me, “be strong”. I did, however, have to go through a series of appointments to repair the damage that had accumulated over the years that I had avoided the dentist, dentist I could have avoided. I have not missed an appointment since, although I get nervous when the machine turns on, even just to polish my teeth.

Like my teeth, a business needs regular checkups to maintain its financial health. Yes, a lot of companies review their financials on a monthly or quarterly basis, but how many are assessing their control systems and taking steps to update and analyze how they prevent and detect fraud? The fact that the median length of a fraud is 18 months before it is detected and that many frauds can last many years as in the cases of Bernie Madoff and Rita Crundwell, to name a few high profile cases, implies that these steps are not taken often and rigorously enough. No one really thinks that it will happen to them and some people think that their finance department, accountant or auditor will keep them safe from fraud. This is because they do not fully understand the roles and duties of their auditors and accountants. Other people don’t want to spend the money on fraud prevention and detection. However, when you start thinking that Rita Crundwell stole over $54 million and a quick search of the internet brings up many other recent cases of embezzlement of millions of dollars that have been discovered. There are many more that either have not been recorded or are of lesser amounts.

Think about this:

  • Fraud goes on for an average of 18 months but many go on for much longer.
  • Usually fraudsters start out stealing a little money but as times goes on and they are not caught, the amounts stolen grow and grow and grow
  • The knowledge that a company has allowed theft to go on under its nose for years can negatively affect its reputation, leading people to believe that it may not be a safe and ethical place to do business

These are just a few things to think about when it comes to detecting and preventing fraud in your company. It only makes sense to get a qualified Forensic Accountant, Certified in Financial Forensics to assess and evaluate your companies systems in order to beef up your fraud prevention programs and also, perhaps to detect possible fraud? Now, I learnt a very painful lesson before I started to take care of my teeth. Do you want to learn a hard, and possibly expensive, lesson before you take proper care of your business?

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

All For Love

Al_Capone_in_Florida

“Valentine’s Day; red roses
It’s said that some have died for love.
In North Clark Street, Chicago
They died for money…”

It was with those words, uttered by Laurence Olivier, on a Paul Hardcastle song about greed, that Al Capone first fascinated me. It started with that tale of the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre – “It’s a good day to die,” the gangster laughed in a scene in the video – and it continued as I learned more about his legacy as a famous gangster. I mean, as perennially single as I have been most of my life, I have been known to don black clothing and disdain on February 14th, but to shoot a bunch of people on that day? That just seemed a little much. You couldn’t wait until the 15th? What kind of person does that? I found out that others were similarly outraged by Capone’s actions and expended a lot of time and energy trying to bring him down.

A few weeks ago, I was reminded of Al Capone when I spoke with Meredith Engel of The New York Daily News. She was reporting on the financial issues faced by those in the marijuana business. Marijuana is legal in some states, such as Colorado and Washington, but is still illegal on a federal level. This dichotomy may lead to confusion on what income is taxable on a state level, where pot is legal, and on a federal level, where it is illegal.

What does this have to do with Al Capone? Well, despite being blamed for the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre, among other murders, and in spite of being investigated for racketeering and his bootlegging business, the authorities struggled to get Capone convicted on his gang-related crimes. However, there was a government agency that he had not seriously considered; the IRS. You see, it does not matter where your income comes from, be it from legal or illegal sources, you have to pay taxes on it.

It doesn’t matter whether you are selling pot or stealing from your boss, if you don’t pay taxes on that money coming into you, you cold find yourself in trouble with the IRS, ranging from interest and fines to imprisonment. Federal agents couldn’t find enough evidence to pin murder on Al Capone, but they were able to use forensic accounting methods to put together enough evidence to indict Capone on tax evasion charges. He was sentenced to 11 years in prison, was fined $50,000, was charged $7,692 in court costs and $215,000 plus interested in back taxes.

Preparing a tax return can get rather complicated. Figuring what deductions, exemptions and credits you are eligible for can be a like navigating a maze. However, the most simple part of the tax return is the income that you start with. If you don’t want to get into trouble with the IRS – REPORT ALL OF IT, regardless of how you came about it.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Ripped From My Headlines?

IMG_2402-0

“Aren’t you excited that they’re making a show about you?” This is how my friend, Tabeel, greeted me this morning.

A show about me and I haven’t been telling you all about it? Well, let me tell you, I’m as surprised as you are, but very delighted about the news. It’s about time. I watch way more than my share of crime shows. I have watched so much vintage Law & Order that I can pretty much tell when we are going to move from the Order to the Law and I can see a twist coming a mile away. When I see a new crime show being advertised on TV, I am pretty much always willing to give it a chance. I am held back from watching more crime-related shows because there are only 24 hours in day and I waste a lot of that time sleeping, working and interacting with the real world. For all the great and wonderful things that the shows do for me, I have a recurring gripe.

Every once in a while, on these shows, the investigators will have to solve a money-related issue and they’ll call in the forensic accountant. The guy, and it’s always a guy, who shows up always looks like he has not seen the light of day in years and appears to have forgotten how to interact with other human beings. His clothes and hair are out of style and the other investigators only put up with him because he talks, geekily, about where the money that they are trying to find went. The forensic accountant is that one guy on the show that no one wants to be. I mean, the coroners are more exciting than the forensic accountant and they deal with corpses!

But all of that is about to change. It is as though someone with access to a television network has been listening in on my conversations and hearing me yelling at the television. Tabeel shared with me that Shonda Rhimes is adding a new show to her resume, “The Catch”, and this show is a show about a forensic accountant. Not a show where a forensic accountant is released from the dungeon every once in a while, to look at numbers. The main character is a forensic accountant and the forensic accountant is a woman! Finally, someone found the right ear to whisper in – the stereotype is not reality. There is so much more to a forensic accountant than we have seen so far on television. At last, someone has decided to make a show about me!

I mean it totally has to be a show about me, right? A female, forensic accountant who is likely to be kick-ass and have many clever and insightful things to say. That’s totally how I roll. I look forward to this show, in between the dramatic twists and cliffhangers, highlighting some of the processes and nuances of what forensic accounting is about.It may begin a movement until finally Law & Order FAU (Forensic Accounting Unit) is launched. The forensic accountant is busting out of the basement and she’s taking no prisoners! Well, there probably be a lot of prisoners but you get what I’m saying. Look out for it, set your DVRs and dive into the world of the crime-fighting CPA!

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

2015! Three Years, Three Words…

James Petrozzello

James Petrozzello

Three years ago, I was inspired by Tom Hood, by way of Chris Brogan. As someone who gave up on New Year’s resolutions years ago, partly because I was not very good at keeping them, partly because I would change my mind about them and partly because I would often lose track of where I had written them down, I found power in the concept of Three Words. I embraced the magic and power of three during my lessons in Latin and in rhetoric. I have found my three words a great theme song that plays in my head throughout the year. They pop up in conversations, in my planning and often at unexpected, random moments. And this year, the magical and powerful three are Receptive, Synergy, and Service.

Receptive: This year, for Christmas, I gave my husband a Bluetooth headset. Ever since I came across my first Bluetooth headset, I have hated those things. People walk around with those things constantly plugged in an ear and it always seems to me that they are only giving you a small piece of their attention and are, essentially, waiting for something more interesting and important to beep in their ear. I have often felt as though people wear the headsets to make themselves feel important and busy. Around Christmas, when my husband mentioned that he wanted one, I started thinking about the Bluetooth headset in a different way. He spends a lot of time travelling and alone in an office. It makes sense that, should he wish to answer the phone, it would make sense to be able to do this and still be able to use both his hands. He has promised to put it in his ear only when he needs it and to not wear it when we are together. Beyond me and my relationship with the Bluetooth headset, I am realizing more and more, how essential it is to success and happiness to be receptive to new (and old) concepts and ideas. At work and as a part of the various boards and committees that I serve on, I have discovered how essential it is to listen to the opinions of others and process them before concluding how I feel about a situation or idea. At times, the ideas of others are better than anything that I had considered; other times, after taking their opinions into consideration, we can come up with a great plan or compromise. In order to continue the spirit of my words from last year, Transform, Pursue and Collaborate, being receptive is key.

Synergy: Last year, one of my words was collaborate. There is the saying, no man is an island, and I have found it to be true. I have lived and learnt in many places and my world and experiences have been touched by an incredible spectrum of people. All this has contributed to who and what I am today. Collaboration is so very much of getting things done but, this year, I want to hone in on synergy. I want to really think about the wonderful notion of how one plus one can equal more than two (sometimes significantly so). So collaboration will not be solely for the purpose of doing things together; to do this without thinking about how to best leverage the power of collaboration can be wasteful, frustrating and diminish the contributions of each party. I want to be mindful of the concept of synergy and ask myself, often, how can we do this so that what we achieve together is greater than what we could achieve acting alone.

Service: I have talked before about the CPA’s obligation to “serve the public trust, honor the public interest, and demonstrate a commitment to professionalism.” As a forensic CPA, this is a very important aspect of our profession. Often there are pressures upon us and, it is at times like this, that it is necessary to act with integrity, in order to honor our obligation to the public and to our profession. As a member of various committees of my State Society of CPAs and the American Institute of CPAs, and as I prepare to take over the presidency of our chapter, I, along with my fellow members must always keep in mind that our goal is to serve the public, our members and our profession with the work that we do.

A couple of years ago, my husband, James, and I traveled to Berlin for a wedding. I had often told him how much I love karaoke and so, when we heard about Bearpit Karaoke, we had to find it. The place was packed and the singers were excellent. My husband encouraged me to put my name down to sing. After hearing the caliber of singers, and after seeing how many people were in attendance (a dauntingly large crowd), I hesitated and tried to make excuses. He finally convinced me and I put my name on a long list. I was told that I probably would not get a chance to sing as many people were ahead of me and they were shutting down soon. I was pretty okay with that – it was enough for me to have been part of the crowd and to almost get a chance to sing. At six o’clock, the time the karaoke was to end, we were just walking away when I heard my name being called. I was nervous and James whipped out his camera. As I got onto the stage and introduced myself and the song I had chosen, Fame, an old man in the crowd caught my eye and gave me a thumbs up. As I sang, the crowd joined in for the chorus and a little kid ambled onto the stage. When I had moments of panic, I looked at him and took courage from his cute face, gazing up at me. Because I chose to be receptive to the idea of singing in front of this crowd, I found that I added a joy to our day that was magnified by our coming together in happiness. And, of course, what a gift and public service this Bearpit Karaoke is. If you are in Berlin, go and get yourself some joy.

The spirit of my words
From 2013: Change, Discover and Motivate
From 2014: Transform, Pursue and Collaborate
carry on and to that spirit I add my three for 2015
Receptive, Synergy and Service.

What are your three words will bring you magic and power this year?

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How Are You Confirming Your “Facts”?

Journalist falling for teen claiming M in stock market profits is object lesson for auditors

Journalist falling for teen claiming $72M in stock market profits is object lesson for auditors.

Attestation Update just wrote about a recent hoax, where a teenager claimed to have made $72 million, trading on the stock market. This article got me thinking about a piece I wrote last year on professional skepticism and the importance of knowing who is confirming your information. The least reliable confirmation comes from the party making the claim, in this case, the alleged millionaire teenager. The journalist that he dealt with thought that the bank statement that the teenager showed her was a valid third party confirmation. This is a very easy assumption to make. It appears that the party is coming from a third party, so it is easy to see that as a third, independent, party confirmation. This, however is not the case. In order for a confirmation to be truly independent, the person making the claim cannot have any control over the confirmation process. As we have seen here and in the cases noted by James Ulvog, it is very easy for someone to hand you a fake document that looks very real. There are actually places that will create very realistic fakes for you, for a price, of course.

Ulvog also pointed out several red flags in the boy’s story. An auditor or forensic CPA, coming across these red flags, should seek to further investigate and seek independent confirmation of the claims. For example, there are age restrictions that make it illegal for minors to buy and sell securities. You should look at the piece at Attestation Update and see if you can determine why the items highlighted by Ulvog are red flags. This piece also underlines the importance of using diligent and qualified professionals. It also emphasizes how we, as professionals must consistently practice professional skepticism and be aware of what are truly third party confirmations and how important it is to make them.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,